TAOP Part Three : Colour – control the strength of a colour

Part 3 Colour

Project: What makes a Colour?

Exercise 1 : Control the strength of a colour

I did this exercise three times.  I used strawberries; then I photographed a deep pink jacket I have, but I decided to work with the following because it also enabled me to do some macro work. I used my 100mm USM lens , with tripod,  on manual at f11, with ISO 200. It was quite a bright day, although not sunny and our conservatory got the best of the light I think.

Here’s how the colour changed as I changed the exposure with consequent change in shutter speed. There are no changes to the raw image in terms of brightness and I didn’t use any sharpness or noise reduction either. No. 2 was the ‘correct’ exposure

No. 1 – 0.4

No. 2 – 0.3

No. 3 – 1/4

No. 4 – 1/5

No, 5 – 1/6

No. 6 – 1/8

I actually like all of them, although I can see how no. 1 is slightly over-exposed. I was also surprised how much the depth of the colour changed.  No. 4 and No. 5 do have less sharpness, and I think that No. 3 which is slightly under-exposed does have the best result in terms of both depth of colour and sharpness.

This was a good little exercise which made me realise how much I can play around with colour by just changing the exposure.

June 2011

University for the Creative Arts, Farnham – Fine Art Degree Show 2011

University for the Creative Arts, Farnham

Fine Art Degree Show 2011

I visited the Exhibition on 11th June, with two fellow OCA students.  The Farnham Campus was originally an Art College but is now part of the University for the Creative Arts. Their website informed me that they have over 2,000 students studying a wide range of creative arts subjects, including fine art, photography, textiles, crafts, film, graphics, journalism and advertising. It was a good opportunity to go along and see some Degree work first-hand.

There was also an Open Day running when we went so there were a large number of young people and their parents being given group talks by staff at various points throughout the College.

Photography Exhibition

Many of the students were exhibiting in a large ground floor hall.

As to be expected, there were a variety of themes depicted. There isn’t space to describe all of them here but I’ll mention some which I found eye-catching.

Emmie Thorstenson is Swedish and she had put together a series of black and white images titled “On the Verge of Adulthood”, which were beautifully exposed, sharp and clear. I’m mentioning her nationality because her images, somehow, reminded me of what I imagine her country is like. I saw that she is also exhibiting at the Bargehouse, Oxo Tower Wharf, London and I think she will be a photographer to watch for in the future.

Chris Spackman had a series “Unstill Life” in memory of a friend of his who had died from cancer.

The above doesn’t capture the quality of his work but his website link is below.  The images are the outcome of continuous exposures of up to three weeks.

From the main hall we wandered the corridors finding exhibitions of other Degree work and also Foundation and Access students.

There were ceramics and glass, including this piece by Emma Clench which was a glowing orange.


One exhibit from Sally Rowe was of cutouts placed in front of a mirror

the information on her website says that her work is concerned with identity, both as a visual construct and as narrative.

There was also one section which, at first sight, purported to be a museum exhibition of work by ornithologists. Paintings and drawings and various artefacts.  It was a clever illusion created by Jose Nieves.  I didn’t take a photograph (I should have done) but his website link is below.

In the Fine art section there was a wonderful piece of mixed media created by Natasha Caine from found objects.

It was titled “Carosellas” which were apparently the Spanish entymology of carousels, and were spinning mechanisms for battle training/tournaments.

We also had opportunity to see some fashion designs

There were several sketchbook/working logs that were pieces of art in themselves.  I’ve seen some on the OCA site of course but they are so much better in reality.


It was, of course, a different experience from visiting the London exhibitions of famous photographers and artists, but so good to see a wide range of work and appreciate the imagination and creativity of the students.  The more informal atmosphere helped me feel nearer to the work as well. This made it less daunting because I could imagine that, if I complete the Degree, I might one day be able to reach their standards.  Because it is a University and I saw several young students visiting on the Open Day I formed an assumption that contributors to the Exhibition were all young adults.  However, I’m probably wrong.

Overall it was very useful to see how the prints were being exhibited – framed, unframed, in box-frames and also on aluminium.  Some of the students had also produced photo-books of varying sizes (including Blurb books) to accompany their images.


11th June 2011



Farnham Campus of UCA: http://ucreative.ac.uk/farnham

University for the Creative Arts: http://www.ucreative.ac.uk/


Chris Spackman : http://www.i-spy-with-my-little-eye.com/Pages/Unstill%20Life.htm

Emma Clench: www.wix.com/emcha88 (although couldn’t access it)

Emmie Thorstenson: http://www.emmiethorstenson.se/galleri.html

Jose Nieves: http://www.josenievesart.co.uk/

Sally Rowe: http://www.sallyrowe.co.uk/SallyRowe/Work.html#3





“Genii Loci” – The Photographic Work of Karen Knorr

genii loci – The Photographic Work of Karen Knorr,

 Campany, D, et al (2002), Black Dog Publishing Ltd, London.

I hadn’t heard of Karen Knorr until my husband brought to my attention a short piece in one of our photography magazines because he thought this was about one of the staff of OCA.  However, she is Professor of Photography at the University of the Creative Arts in Farnham and had won the Pilar Citoler International Prize for Contemporary Photography (and 15,00 Euros).  The photograph which won the prize, ‘Flight to Freedom’ was one of a series of pictures featuring animals in northern India.

I live near to Farnham (in Surrey) and had originally looked at the Farnham University website when I was thinking of doing a photography course.  Out of curiosity,  I decided to look up the information about Karen Knorr , both on the University website and her own (http://www.karenknorr.com/about/). Her photography looked very interesting and I ordered a book from Amazon.  I have been intending to record my thoughts on the book for a few months now and a visit yesterday to the Degree Exhibition at Farnham University has prompted me.

Here is the synopsis which I’m including because it gives the information in a much better way than I ever could:-

 “Including essays and an interview with Karen Knorr, this extensively illustrated text is a comprehensive overview of the photographer’s work from the 1990s to 2002. Knorr’s photographs explore with wit and humour the patronage and heritage that informs our ideas of art and national identity, with images taken at historical art collections and stately homes, and new developments using sound, installation and video. Knorr has been making photographs since the early 1980s, using a documentary style that recalls earlier traditions of portraiture and painting”


There are three main sections in the book which are preceded by a scholarly overview  from one of the three authors.  In the first section Antonio Guzman begins with an analysis of the Connoisseurs series of photographs (1986-1989) which he believes marks the distinction between the origins of Knorr’s work and her approach today. In Connoisseurs she, ”….abandons the abstract formalism of black and white photography and undertakes the exclusive practice of colour” (p.9), with a further change of format and object.  The square format replaces the rectangular and the work is referenced to painting rather than printed photography of published image. Overall,  the phraseology is reverential in tone and I have to admit that, at this stage of my photographic journey, I found it rather hard to read.  I still do!

What seems clear though is that Knorr is a very literate photographer and she uses classical allegory and metaphor in her work.  The prose was illustrated at various points with almost thumbprint images on the whole and it was with relief that I moved on to look at the full page colour photographs which are rich and striking

I’m not going to describe all of them, just the ones which particularly struck me and where possible will give links.

The Analysis of Beauty:

Depicts two men in a salon/gallery, surrounded by ornate pictures and looking at them through telescopes.


to me this is about the scrutiny of works of art, putting them under the microscope to determine their constituents and meanings. It also  reminded me of how often photographers (meaning me!) go round with their camera in front of their noses when they are surrounded by beautiful scenes which are just waiting to be absorbed.

There is also a whole series of images which include stuffed animals in stately houses as if they are visitors.

Where Have All the Sparrows Gone?

Is this a comment on the way we preserve our art treasures but ignore endangered species?


Having looked at the book again, I still find the commentary almost akin to hagiography and, in many respects, it makes me feel distanced from the images. However, the photographs are beautifully presented and some of them are of ‘ordinary’ subjects, such as dogs. Karen Knoor obviously has the prestige which enables her to set up the artistic images in stately surroundings and it was interesting for me to note yesterday, her other working environment – a suburban University in a small town in Surrey.

12th June 2011


Campany, D, et al , genii loci – The Photographic Work of Karen Knorr       2002, Black Dog Publishing Ltd, London.




Part 3: Colour – Initial thoughts and reading around colour

Part  3 : Colour – Some Initial thoughts and reading


I set out on Part 3 with with some questions in mind.  How do we see colour; do different people have different responses to it; what happens when people are colour-blind and how might this affect them as photographers, also how is our emotional response to colour affected by our culture as well as our physiology? I read around it all and did some research but am now attempting overall to keep it as simple as possible for myself.  This curiosity about colour and colour perception was intensified when I read about the difference between saturation and brightness in the workbook whilst preparing for the first exercise on colour.  I decided I need to understand more.

The effect of colour

Colour works on 3 levels. They are: Visual – this is the objective, immediately obvious level; Expressive – the emotional level, evoking sensations that are often subjective and non-visual; Symbolic – the cultural level, where certaincolours and combinations are associated with things that we have been brought up with. (Basic Colour Theory, Course Supplement). Individual colours have a variety of cultural associations such as national colours (as in flags), and the use of white (weddings in Western cultures and funerals in China).  The same colour may also have different associations within the same culture at any time, e.g. red for danger with its connotations of blood, but also for romance/passion.

The earth’s colours change from one season to the next. Grasses change their hue and sunsets differ in intensity and hue.  Generally winter flowers are more subdued than summer flowers in both blossoms and leaves. This means that colours can be used differently to evoke a feeling of one particular season or another.  Nature routinely uses several color combinations. Flowers tend to have mono-chromatic, analogous and complementary colour schemes. Leaves are more apt to use a mono-chromatic or analogous colour scheme.

Analogous, split-complementary and complementary colour schemes are often displayed in sunsets and sunrises. The ocean, lakes and other bodies of water appear monochromatic or analogous unless a sunrise’s or sunset’s hues intermingle with them. Warm colours are associated with sunlight, heat, excitement and happiness. They have more ability to be luminous than cool colours do. Warm colours advance visually , for example red in the forground can enhance  sense of depth. Yellow, the brightest of colours, has obvious associations with sources of light.  Cool colours tend to recede into the distance, for instance blue recedes more than yellow.  Its primary symbolism derives from its occurrences in nature – the sky and water. Manipulating adjacent hues can make any colour register as either cool or warm.

Colour Perception


The human’s eye ability to distinguish colours is based upon the varying sensitivity of different cells in the retina to light of different wavelengths. The message is passed to the optic nerve and then on to the brain. Humans are trichomatic which means that the retina contains three types of colour receptor cells – cones of which there are about 6 to 7 million.. One type is most responsive to light that we see as violet (wavelength around 420 nm) and this is distinct from the other two which are closely related both genetically and chemically. Red cones are most sensitive to light we see as greenish yellow (wavelengths around 564 nm) and green cones are most sensitive to light perceived as green (wavelengths around 534 m).

The other type of light sensitive cell in the eye is the rod, of which there are about 120 million in the eye.. The rods are more sensitive thant cones, but sensitive to low light, not to colour and they perceive images as black, white and different shades of grey, responding better to blue light than red.  The cones, which require a greater intensity of light, are sensitive to colour.  When the light is bright enough to stimulate the cones the rods play little part in vision.  In dim light, when the cones are understimulated, leaving only signals from the rods and this leads to a ‘colourless’ response.  These effects are described in the Kruithof curve that describes the change of color perception and ‘pleasingness’ of light as a function of temperature and intensity.

“…the color of an object is a complex result of its surface properties, its transmission properties, and its emission properties, all of which factors contribute to the mix of wavelengths in the light leaving the surface of the object. The perceived color is then further conditioned by the nature of the ambient illumination, and by the color properties of other objects nearby, via the effect known as color constancy and via other characteristics of the perceiving eye and brain.”


Combinations of cones are stimulated when we see perceive a colour that has a wavelength between  that of the primary colours red, green and blue this results in our being able to detect light of all colours in the visible spectrum.  I’m thinking of a rainbow here.

So far I have understood that  the perception of colour is mainly due to the absorption and scattering properties of whatever we are looking at being different from the incoming wavelengths of light that illuminate it.  There are other effects in the mix.  For example, we see green leaves as green because leaves and other green plants use chlorophyll to change light into energy.  Chlorophyll absorbs the red and blue colours of the spectrum and reflects the green. The cones and rods of the eye pick up on this particular wavelength and frequency of green and send the message to the brain.

Differences in Colour Perception

One website that I looked at states that  if we lose our eye sight the body adapts and receives colour rays through our skin, but I couldn’t find any other references to that.  Another website described a lady who lost her eyesight and then became a painter.  It quoted her as saying that she painted from memory and distinguished the different colours of paint by dipping her fingers into the paint because each colour had a different texture which she could feel.

I wanted to find out whether everyone sees colours the same.  Certainly my husband and I often disagree as to whether a colour is blue or green, M. Freeman (2007) also comments that many people have difficulty in judging the colour of blue precisely.  Certainly, as I have become older I’ve needed more light to see clearly, so presumably age affects the rods and cones in the eyes and therefore their response to wavelengths of light.  I found a brief report on a 2010 Project, “Do you see what I see”, which was presented at the California State Science Fair.  The hypothesis was that people see colours differently, especially as they age. The method involved an LED light box, consisting of two different coloured lights, red and green, each separately controlled. The red light was set to a constant colour as measured by the DMM and subjects were asked to adjust the green LED in such a way as to produce a third colour. The voltage of the green LED was then measured to determine an individual subject’s colour perception.  The DMM reading of each subject was placed on a graph and plotted by age and gender. It was shown that in both genders, as a person ages, the DMM measurement gets higher, which means they see colours as duller.  In particular, the colour perception of men decreases significantly past the age of 45.  Although colour perception also changes in women as they age it is not as significant as men. The results also show that male and female colour perceptions differ from each other slightly when younger.  This was an interesting experiment but, unfortunately the Project Summary didn’t give information on how many people were tested and the other necessary information to establish whether the experiment was scientifically valid.

People who suffer from colour-blindness have less numbers of particular cones than normal which means they get colours confused. There are different types of colour blindness  the most common form being red-green.  I am particularly interested in the effect of colour blindness on photographers and how that impacts upon their photography.

Colour-blind Photographers

One of my fellow students linked me to a relevant Flickr site which I found fascinating.  One of the discussion threads was, “ what makes a colour-blind photographer or hobbyist different from others?”


Photographers commented on such areas as basing photographs on feelings and composition and not colour; more easily understanding the abstract nature of black and white; being more sensitive to differences in tone and that being colour-blind helps to get tones and contrasts just right.

I liked the effects of their images.  With many of them I could see a difference in the tones, in both black/white and colour which I find difficult to describe – something slightly duo-toned/de-saturated, maybe more on the low-key side and, in the black and white, more of a hint of sepia which I imagined might be due to a particular use of filters.  Even with HDR effects I found the images more calming to my eyes. I’ve joined the group because I find the images very interesting and maybe in time and with more knowledge/experience I’ll be able to work out the differences more precisely.


This has been a brief summary of my reading around colour to give me a starting point on Part 3. I’m going to return to this as I carry out the various Exercises, particularly the use of colour in photography and how this can be used symbolically and to evoke particular emotions/sensations.

1st June 2011


 “Basic Colour Theory”, Photography Course Supplement

Freeman, M, The Photographers Eye, 2007

Wilcox, M, “Blue and Yellow don’t make Green”, 1987, Artways, Perth, W. Aus

Wolfrom,J,  “Color Play”, 2000, C & T Publishing, California